Oh yes, thanks a lot! I’m so happy you’re still in the air and online. The hpl is a unique website, I think. I never saw a simular website about e.g. Roald Dahl’s work or something about Tolkien’s “lord of the ring”-series (the hobbit included, of course). So, the hpl seems an unique website-project, and I love it.
— November 22, 2009 @ 10:30 am
wisteria53 wrote:
If there’s anything a non-HTML person can do (proofreading in plain text?), the offer to help still stands. T
— November 22, 2009 @ 3:23 pm
julia wrote:
you saw JKR’s twitter page http://twitter.com/jk_rowling
‘I am told that people have been twittering on my behalf, so I thought a brief visit was in order just to prevent any more confusion! However, I should flag up now that although I could twitter endlessly, I’m afraid you won’t be hearing from me very often….
as pen and paper is my priority at the moment
and her comments at the stella mccartney show as reported in the telegraph
JK Rowling bid for three tickets to see Stella McCartney’s Paris show at a Gala Auction in London, in June, to raise funds for the Raisa Gorbachev Foundation, and bought along two friends. “I’m working on something, but it’s not Harry Potter,” she said. “I need a Harry break.”
I have a set of guidelines all worked out for people to help with the editing of the site. However, I asked for some advice in procedures from a good friend whose opinion I really trust and she hasn’t gotten back to me. Frankly, I sort of let it slip to the back burner when I didn’t hear back right away. So the plan in in place — almost. Thanks for the offer, and those who emailed me to vounteer will hear from me directly soon.
As for Rowling’s Twitter account, I never got around to following her. I suppose I should …
Steve
— November 24, 2009 @ 7:19 pm
hpboy13 wrote:
THE LEXICON LIVES!!!!! Good to see this being brought up-to-date on DH at last.
— November 25, 2009 @ 11:30 pm
Jesse wrote:
Glad to see some work being done. Thank you, Steve, for all the hard work you put into this site, it’s much appreciated!
— November 26, 2009 @ 7:33 pm
Witheld upon request wrote:
Get a life brother. The books were good, but sheesh.
— November 28, 2009 @ 9:59 am
Reader2 wrote:
Did some of the funs just get their first date and deside that they are too grownup for children’s books now?
Just wait till you get your first heartbreak, then you will know why grownups need hobbies.
Don’t listen to anyone Steeve, this site is well worth maintaining.
— November 28, 2009 @ 5:56 pm
Taj wrote:
Hey Steve, thanks for the edit! But I noticed a lil mistake…on the main Ministry of Magic page it says: “The Ministry of Magic is the governmental authority OF THE FOR THE wizarding world…”
I think you meant to just write “of the wizarding world…”
Thanks for the heads up, Taj! Yeah, that kind of things can happen when you’re cutting and pasting text from an older version of a page to a newer. I’ll fix it straightaway.
Steve
— November 30, 2009 @ 8:31 pm
Stacy wrote:
Steve thank you so much for the hard work! It is so much fun to be able to surf around on the lexicon for a little while to escape during the day. My favorite part is the essays! Speaking of the essays, have people just plain stopped submitting them? Is there any hope for new ones?
I would certainly consider any new essays which would come in. However, we haven’t had any essay submissions for quite some time.
Steve
— December 1, 2009 @ 5:28 pm
hpboy13 wrote:
Well, I tried submitting essays a while back, but got no response and assumed that part of the site hadbecome like an archive or something. I’ll go dust some of mine off.
— December 1, 2009 @ 8:11 pm
dragonfr wrote:
“the books were good”. of course they were good! But although I know not everyone can love them, give us fans a break. If HP can make so many people happy, then why not?
— December 9, 2009 @ 12:54 am
Kaz Walters wrote:
Has anyone ever noticed that Voldemort’s wand length numerologicaly breaks down to 7? 1+3+1+2=7. Coincidence?
— December 9, 2009 @ 11:50 pm
Reader2 wrote:
Probably just a coincidence, number 13, however, got to be deliberate.
— December 10, 2009 @ 1:04 am
dragonfr wrote:
maybe it was written deliberately to show the significance of 7? That’s really cool though! How’d you spot that?
— December 10, 2009 @ 11:49 pm
Mikkel wrote:
Since it will be Christmas soon and I’ll be away on holiday…
A very Harry Christmas to Steve and all the rest of you.
— December 22, 2009 @ 5:37 am
Nicola Vojvodic (16) wrote:
Thnx for edit Steve.I almost got a feeling that all HP books fans got bored and left, I felt odd like asking myself how is everybody forgot Wizarding World? Is it possible that Im only person which still tries to get there?I don’t have anyone to speak about it. Everything around me remind me at HP, I do live in magical world but Im alone.I read and read and write, think about it. I really appreciate what Reader2 said.I need HP friend at least via internet.:-(
— December 25, 2009 @ 9:53 pm
Lucette wrote:
Happy New Year! Remember, there is still the Scottish book to theorize about. What side plots were taken out - what was changed, what information never made it into the books! It is not over until the Scottish book.
Maybe then we will find out whether Florence was male or female (book never says) - who Dudley married (I’m hoping Millicent) - and whether or not Scorpius breaks with the family tradition.
— January 1, 2010 @ 6:23 pm
Reader2 wrote:
Happy New Year, everyone!
Lucette, you are right that there is plenty for us to find out if and when the Scottish book comes out, but we already have something for the particular questions you’ve asked.
When Rowling was asked if Dudley might have magical children, she said that no magic could servive contact with Vernon’s genes, so Dudley’s family is still very muggle, that in itself destroys any theories of Dudley marring Millicent or any other witch.
The epilogue practiaclly forces Rose/Scorpious ship at us, which in turn suggests that Scorpius is not like the prevoius Malfoys (although I am rather annoyed by all those fics that make him a Gryffindor, and the reason is his name, Scorpio is a watery sign, which points him toward Slytherin, and in Rowlings world names are destiny).
As for mystery Florence, that character is way too minor to come with any special surpirses.
The way Rowling responded to some questions about sexuality of various characters, suggests that Dumbledore was her gift to anyone who wanted variety in that department, and she doesn’t have any more of those planned.
After a gift that big, there should be no reason to ask for more.
— January 2, 2010 @ 1:48 am
aep2398 wrote:
Oh my gosh, thank you so much! You don’t know how much I needed that, for FanFiction and DeviantArt! Thank you.
— January 15, 2010 @ 10:55 am
Leave your thoughts
Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
Alex wrote:
Thank you SO much for taking the time to update the Lexicon!
— November 21, 2009 @ 5:15 am
r4 dsi wrote:
Thanks a lot…
— November 21, 2009 @ 7:04 am
Random wrote:
Yes thank you!!
— November 21, 2009 @ 10:16 am
Katty wrote:
Oh yes, thanks a lot! I’m so happy you’re still in the air and online. The hpl is a unique website, I think. I never saw a simular website about e.g. Roald Dahl’s work or something about Tolkien’s “lord of the ring”-series (the hobbit included, of course). So, the hpl seems an unique website-project, and I love it.
— November 22, 2009 @ 10:30 am
wisteria53 wrote:
If there’s anything a non-HTML person can do (proofreading in plain text?), the offer to help still stands. T
— November 22, 2009 @ 3:23 pm
julia wrote:
you saw JKR’s twitter page
http://twitter.com/jk_rowling
‘I am told that people have been twittering on my behalf, so I thought a brief visit was in order just to prevent any more confusion! However, I should flag up now that although I could twitter endlessly, I’m afraid you won’t be hearing from me very often….
as pen and paper is my priority at the moment
and her comments at the stella mccartney show as reported in the telegraph
JK Rowling bid for three tickets to see Stella McCartney’s Paris show at a Gala Auction in London, in June, to raise funds for the Raisa Gorbachev Foundation, and bought along two friends. “I’m working on something, but it’s not Harry Potter,” she said. “I need a Harry break.”
— November 24, 2009 @ 5:18 am
Steve wrote:
I have a set of guidelines all worked out for people to help with the editing of the site. However, I asked for some advice in procedures from a good friend whose opinion I really trust and she hasn’t gotten back to me. Frankly, I sort of let it slip to the back burner when I didn’t hear back right away. So the plan in in place — almost. Thanks for the offer, and those who emailed me to vounteer will hear from me directly soon.
Steve
— November 24, 2009 @ 7:18 pm
Steve wrote:
As for Rowling’s Twitter account, I never got around to following her. I suppose I should …
Steve
— November 24, 2009 @ 7:19 pm
hpboy13 wrote:
THE LEXICON LIVES!!!!! Good to see this being brought up-to-date on DH at last.
— November 25, 2009 @ 11:30 pm
Jesse wrote:
Glad to see some work being done. Thank you, Steve, for all the hard work you put into this site, it’s much appreciated!
— November 26, 2009 @ 7:33 pm
Witheld upon request wrote:
Get a life brother. The books were good, but sheesh.
— November 28, 2009 @ 9:59 am
Reader2 wrote:
Did some of the funs just get their first date and deside that they are too grownup for children’s books now?
Just wait till you get your first heartbreak, then you will know why grownups need hobbies.
Don’t listen to anyone Steeve, this site is well worth maintaining.
— November 28, 2009 @ 5:56 pm
Taj wrote:
Hey Steve, thanks for the edit! But I noticed a lil mistake…on the main Ministry of Magic page it says: “The Ministry of Magic is the governmental authority OF THE FOR THE wizarding world…”
I think you meant to just write “of the wizarding world…”
— November 29, 2009 @ 10:46 pm
Steve wrote:
Thanks for the heads up, Taj! Yeah, that kind of things can happen when you’re cutting and pasting text from an older version of a page to a newer. I’ll fix it straightaway.
Steve
— November 30, 2009 @ 8:31 pm
Stacy wrote:
Steve thank you so much for the hard work! It is so much fun to be able to surf around on the lexicon for a little while to escape during the day. My favorite part is the essays! Speaking of the essays, have people just plain stopped submitting them? Is there any hope for new ones?
— December 1, 2009 @ 3:02 pm
Steve wrote:
I would certainly consider any new essays which would come in. However, we haven’t had any essay submissions for quite some time.
Steve
— December 1, 2009 @ 5:28 pm
hpboy13 wrote:
Well, I tried submitting essays a while back, but got no response and assumed that part of the site hadbecome like an archive or something. I’ll go dust some of mine off.
— December 1, 2009 @ 8:11 pm
dragonfr wrote:
“the books were good”. of course they were good! But although I know not everyone can love them, give us fans a break. If HP can make so many people happy, then why not?
— December 9, 2009 @ 12:54 am
Kaz Walters wrote:
Has anyone ever noticed that Voldemort’s wand length numerologicaly breaks down to 7? 1+3+1+2=7. Coincidence?
— December 9, 2009 @ 11:50 pm
Reader2 wrote:
Probably just a coincidence, number 13, however, got to be deliberate.
— December 10, 2009 @ 1:04 am
dragonfr wrote:
maybe it was written deliberately to show the significance of 7? That’s really cool though! How’d you spot that?
— December 10, 2009 @ 11:49 pm
Mikkel wrote:
Since it will be Christmas soon and I’ll be away on holiday…
A very Harry Christmas to Steve and all the rest of you.
— December 22, 2009 @ 5:37 am
Nicola Vojvodic (16) wrote:
Thnx for edit Steve.I almost got a feeling that all HP books fans got bored and left, I felt odd like asking myself how is everybody forgot Wizarding World? Is it possible that Im only person which still tries to get there?I don’t have anyone to speak about it. Everything around me remind me at HP, I do live in magical world but Im alone.I read and read and write, think about it. I really appreciate what Reader2 said.I need HP friend at least via internet.:-(
— December 25, 2009 @ 9:53 pm
Lucette wrote:
Happy New Year! Remember, there is still the Scottish book to theorize about. What side plots were taken out - what was changed, what information never made it into the books! It is not over until the Scottish book.
Maybe then we will find out whether Florence was male or female (book never says) - who Dudley married (I’m hoping Millicent) - and whether or not Scorpius breaks with the family tradition.
— January 1, 2010 @ 6:23 pm
Reader2 wrote:
Happy New Year, everyone!
Lucette, you are right that there is plenty for us to find out if and when the Scottish book comes out, but we already have something for the particular questions you’ve asked.
When Rowling was asked if Dudley might have magical children, she said that no magic could servive contact with Vernon’s genes, so Dudley’s family is still very muggle, that in itself destroys any theories of Dudley marring Millicent or any other witch.
The epilogue practiaclly forces Rose/Scorpious ship at us, which in turn suggests that Scorpius is not like the prevoius Malfoys (although I am rather annoyed by all those fics that make him a Gryffindor, and the reason is his name, Scorpio is a watery sign, which points him toward Slytherin, and in Rowlings world names are destiny).
As for mystery Florence, that character is way too minor to come with any special surpirses.
The way Rowling responded to some questions about sexuality of various characters, suggests that Dumbledore was her gift to anyone who wanted variety in that department, and she doesn’t have any more of those planned.
After a gift that big, there should be no reason to ask for more.
— January 2, 2010 @ 1:48 am
aep2398 wrote:
Oh my gosh, thank you so much! You don’t know how much I needed that, for FanFiction and DeviantArt! Thank you.
— January 15, 2010 @ 10:55 am